A professional’s brief stint at a new workplace has sparked discussions about the importance of workplace culture and adaptability.
The employee, who resigned on their first day, cited two primary reasons for their decision: the prohibition of laptops for work and a rigid, outdated operational environment.
This incident was shared on the subreddit Indian Workplace, where it gained significant attention from professionals.
It has shed light on the challenges posed by mismatched work styles and outdated organizational practices.
Reason No. 1: No Laptop Allowed for Work
The employee was shocked to discover that laptops were not permitted for work.
Instead, senior management relied heavily on physical documents, requiring employees to print reports and deliver them manually for review.
This practice felt inefficient and frustrating, especially for someone accustomed to a tech-savvy workflow.
The company heavily relied on paper-based processes, reflecting its deeply rooted conventional practices.
These practices starkly contrasted with the employee’s previous experience in fast-paced startup environments.
Reason No. 2: Grueling Work Hours
Another major concern was the excessively long working hours imposed on employees.
Most staff members were required to work 12-hour shifts, starting from 9 a.m. and ending at 9 p.m.
This grueling schedule raised serious questions about work-life balance and overall sustainability.
The employee noted that such demanding hours seemed to be the norm, further solidifying their decision to leave.
Broader Workplace Challenges and Community Reactions
The employee described the organization as lacking structure and order, with a rigid mindset permeating all levels of the company—from top executives to frontline staff.
These early red flags were enough to convince the individual that the work environment was not a good fit.
They expressed concerns about the consequences of leaving so soon, particularly the risk of being marked as “absconding” in their Provident Fund (PF) records.
This label could potentially raise suspicion among future employers and impact their professional credibility.
The employee’s story struck a chord with readers, many of whom applauded their decision to prioritize mental well-being over short-term discomfort.
Comments ranged from congratulating the individual for their bravery to criticizing the company for its archaic practices.
One commenter humorously remarked, “If they mark me as absconded for leaving after seeing the Stone Age live in action, I’ll just tell future employers that I escaped a time machine accident.”
Note: We are also on WhatsApp, LinkedIn, Google News, and YouTube, to get the latest news updates, Subscribe to our Channels. WhatsApp– Click Here, Google News– Click Here, YouTube – Click Here, and LinkedIn– Click Here.
